Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you may People Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional study away from intimacy, passion, and you will partnership: Assessment the fresh presumptions of triangular idea away from like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot regarding accessory within the human mating. Overview of General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Log away from Personal Activities, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A social tech one decrease societal involvement and you can emotional better-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, timing, and you will duration of marriages and you will divorces. Latest Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception most readily useful in the doing bad: Public reviews inside close dating. Log of Identification and Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal out of Identity and you can Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can glamorous choices: The new advanced therapy out of relationship maintenance. Progression and you may Individual Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study of disagreement and you may accord inside the disappointed and you can nondistressed relationship couples. Diary of Asking and you may Health-related Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships development online: What is the big destination? Diary of Societal Items, 58(1), 9–31.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the design out of satisfaction for the close matchmaking. Record of Identity and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation motives in the personal dating: A model of global improvement and certain verification. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents on examination of couple interaction (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Push.
Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit knowledge out-of intimate rivalry
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-therapist thread from lens out-of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Browse, Behavior, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new public monitoring system: Enhanced sensitiveness to help you personal cues given that a transformative a reaction to personal exemption. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exception, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Force.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Worldwide and particular relational activities from the experience of public interactions. Diary out of Character and you may Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can guidance seeking in the intimate relationship. Character and Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular accessory representations into the adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Diary Out-of Public And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A good. (2001)mitment and dating maintenance systems. Inside J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic romantic dating: Fix and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection really impression certainly spouses due to the fact a purpose of the similarity in their mutual event. Character And Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience off extrinsic advantages for the preference and enjoying. Journal away from Identity and Public Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.